Legal Opinion

Barroilhet v. Anspacher

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1885No. 8391PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to quiet title to a block of land known as block No. 5, in the town of Livermore, in Alameda County.

By their answer, the defendants set up the statute of limitations, and then certain facts under which they claimed that the plaintiff held the title to the land in trust for them.

The case was tried and j udgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the appeal is from that judgment and an order denying a motion for new trial.

The facts out of which the case arose are as follows: In March, 1875, A. D. Splivalo owned this block No. 5, and other parcels of land in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pratt v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Jefferson v. WendtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Smith v. MatthewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Breitenbucher v. OppenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cook v. ElmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Culver v. GrahamWyoming Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API