Legal Opinion
Pease v. Director of Michigan Department of Social Services
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1981No. Docket 50537PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.
Karen Pease appeals a circuit court decision upholding the denial by the Michigan Department of Social Services of her claim that her AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) benefits were improperly terminated.
The termination of benefits was based on §§ 56g(l)(a) and (c) of the Social Welfare Act, which provide:
"(1) Aid to dependent children may be provided to a dependent child or family who, in addition to the requirements under § 56 meets the following:
"(a) Does not own tangible and intangible property having a market value in excess of $1,500.00 for a single individual, or if a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Quern v. MandleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKee v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Kilpatrick v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Roy v. Commissioner, Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Romero v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988