Legal Opinion

Gauche v. London & Lancashire Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Decided December 19, 1881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, D. J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance against loss by ñre. The defendant pleaded special pleas, or, as *348under our Code of Practice they would be termed, dilatory exceptions, along with the plea to the merits. These pleas are to the effect that the conditions precedent established by the policy have not been performed : (1) In that no proper preliminary proofs were furnished ; and (2) that there had been no arbitration whereby the “amount of loss” must be determined, and that until these conditions have been performed no right of action in the plaintiff exists. The court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Billmeyer v. Evans & RodenbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Kimball v. Hamilton Fire InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861
  4. Norton v. Rensselaer & Saratoga InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Chippewa Lumber Co. v. Phenix InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gray v. Reliable Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. McNees v. Southern InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Rives-Strong Building, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API