Legal Opinion
US Sugar Corp. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 2, 1985No. 84-2418PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
475 So.2d 1350 (1985)
UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION and Frank Leonard Polhill, Appellants,
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 84-2418.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 2, 1985.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Jones & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.
George Boggs and Stephen E. Hooper of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee.
OTT, Acting Chief Judge.
In this case we review the trial court's interpretation of the phrase "furnished for regular use" appearing in a Nationwide automobile insurance policy.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- National Automobile Insurance Ass'n v. BrumitSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Safeco Insurance v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Walters v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- American States Insurance v. TannerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Am. Motorists Ins. v. FARREY'S WH. HARDWARE CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Lancer Ins. Co. v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Budget Rent-A-Car v. STATE FARM AUTO INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.