Legal Opinion

Shemilt v. Sturos

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. 26432. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

December 26, 1935, a judgment was entered in the superior court of King county in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants. The action was for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s husband, resulting from a collision of an automobile, in which he was riding, with a truck owned by defendants. The collision ocurred November 18, 1932.

December 6,1933, the defendant wife filed a declaration of homestead on certain property in King county. Plaintiff, conceiving the declaration insufficient under the statute to effectuate a homestead, brought this action to have it declared invalid. Among other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Whitworth v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hookway v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hansen v. Union Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Dowd v. Estate of DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In re MapesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  4. White v. GoldingWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API