Legal Opinion

Parmele v. Schroeder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1900No. 9,084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Oass county. Heard below before Ramsey, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

These actions, which have been consolidated and are submitted together, were instituted in the district court of Cass county to foreclose real estate mortgages executed by Fred and Emma Schroeder. Renneau, Linder and Hahn were made defendants, on the theory that they had purchased the mortgaged premises of the Schroeders, *554and had, as a part of the transaction, assumed and agreed to pay the several items of indebtedness secured by the mortgages. The trial court rendered a decree of foreclosui*e in the usual form, and at the same time fixed and established the liability of appellants for any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dainese v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Barker v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Tama County v. MelendySupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ribble v. FurminNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Vetter v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Jenkins Land & Live Stock Co. v. KimseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API