Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1996No. 94-3577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to file a brief in proper person, appellant has elected not to do so. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the $2.00 cost imposed for Criminal Justice Education by Municipalities and Counties be stricken, because this was a discretionary cost…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API