Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Amerson (MAG2)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 23, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00374Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SEAN HENDERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:24-cv-374-RAH-CWB ) CODY AMERSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. Introduction Sean Henderson (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Cody Amerson and Brady Amerson (“Defendants”) in their individual capacities—asserting claims under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. (See Doc. 22). In short, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants subjected him…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API