Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Chanute

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1901No. 12,339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; L. Stillwell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was, delivered by

Doster, O. J.:

This was an action to abate a nuisance brought in the court below by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error. A demurrer to the petition as to the city of Chanute was sustained, but overruled as to the other plaintiffs, and, therefore, the city is not a party to this proceeding in error. The plaintiffs in error, defendants below, are the proprietors of a hotel situated in the city. The alleged nuisance consists of kitchen washings, excreta from *244the hotel closets, and other refuse and filthy matter, drained from the hotel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. School District No. 1 v. NeilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Drainage District No. Three v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Winbigler v. CliftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. George v. PeckhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API