Komatz Construction, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
This is an appeal from summary judgment limiting to $500 the amount of damages sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendant’s delay in transmitting a message.
At 9:14 a. m., plaintiff’s employee sent a telegram from St. Peter, Minnesota, to Baudette, Minnesota, using defendant’s facilities. The message was not written on a Western Union blank but was typed on a letterhead of plaintiff. Plaintiff’s employee informed defendant’s agent that the message must be in Baudette by 2 p. m. of that same day.
The telegram was transmitted from St. Peter to the following cities: Mankato;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeightSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kellerman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Shoemaker v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- American Inmate Phone Systems, Inc. v. US Sprint Communications Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.