Legal Opinion

Komatz Construction, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1971No. 42433PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgment limiting to $500 the amount of damages sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendant’s delay in transmitting a message.

At 9:14 a. m., plaintiff’s employee sent a telegram from St. Peter, Minnesota, to Baudette, Minnesota, using defendant’s facilities. The message was not written on a Western Union blank but was typed on a letterhead of plaintiff. Plaintiff’s employee informed defendant’s agent that the message must be in Baudette by 2 p. m. of that same day.

The telegram was transmitted from St. Peter to the following cities: Mankato;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeightSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kellerman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shoemaker v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. American Inmate Phone Systems, Inc. v. US Sprint Communications Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API