Legal Opinion

Pope v. Seckworth

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel for damages to a river barge.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The question of jurisdiction was raised upon the argument of this case, but I have no doubt of the jurisdiction of admiralty in such a case as the present. If authority is needed, it will be found by reference to the case of Ex parte Boyer, 109 U. S. 629, 3 Sup. Ct. Rep. 434, and the case of The Belfast, 7 Wall. 624. Lewis Pope & Sons, libelants, *831were on June 21, 189J, tlie owners of a certain barge, which on that day lay in the Allegheny river, at the foot of Twenty-Second street, in the city of Pittsburgh. It was laden with railroad ties and locust posts, belonging to Barrett & Dunbar, also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The BelfastSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Ex Parte BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. The NellieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Erie R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  2. The No. 6HDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1901
  3. The Theodore SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1921
  4. Florenzie v. FeyNew York District Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API