Legal Opinion

The No. 6H

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 16, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

On Saturday, February 24, 1900, two scows (herein called “B scows”) .were moored alongside the breakwater at Erie Basin with good and strong lines, which would have been quite equal to withstand the strains put -upon them by the tempestous weather that occurred on the following morning had not two other scows (herein called “H scows”), during the afternoon- and evening of the 24th, moored to the B scows, and a little later another scow, the Admiral, moored alongside the H scows. So five scows, lashed together, depended upon the lines of the B scows. When the scows were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scott v. Ira ChaffeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1880
  2. Jones v. American EagleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1893
  3. Hastorf v. The GovernorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
  4. The Thomas Purcell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. Neall v. SchraderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NM Paterson & Sons, Limited v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  2. McWilliams v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
  3. Nickert v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API