United States v. Bland
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DeCICCO, Judge:
This case involves the conflict between a servieemember’s obligation under a general regulation to report offenses which come un*920der his or her observation and that service-member’s right against self-incrimination. Under the facts of this case, we find that appellant was properly convicted of fading to report offenses and affirm.
Pursuant to his gudty pleas, appellant stands convicted of violating a lawful general regulation, making a false official statement to an investigator, and assault in violation of Articles 92, 107 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SerianneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. SerianneNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009