Legal Opinion

United States v. Bland

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 7, 1994No. NMCM 93 01324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Judge:

This case involves the conflict between a servieemember’s obligation under a general regulation to report offenses which come un*920der his or her observation and that service-member’s right against self-incrimination. Under the facts of this case, we find that appellant was properly convicted of fading to report offenses and affirm.

Pursuant to his gudty pleas, appellant stands convicted of violating a lawful general regulation, making a false official statement to an investigator, and assault in violation of Articles 92, 107 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SerianneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. SerianneNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API