Legal Opinion
United States v. Maali
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 28, 2005No. 2:02-cv-00171PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANTOON, District Judge.
This Memorandum sets forth the reasoning for the Court’s earlier decision to grant Defendants David Portlock (“Port-lock”) and M. Saleem Khanani’s (“Khana-ni”) Motions for Acquittal on Count Fifty-Five of the United States Government’s (“the Government”) Third Superceding Indictment (Doc. 552).
I. Procedural Background
The Government’s Third Superceding Indictment (“Indictment”) against Defendants included charges that they: knowingly encouraged or induced aliens to reside in the United States unlawfully in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iv); conspired to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Alan Masters, Michael J. Corbitt, and James D. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. KhananiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. YusufCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. $256,235.97District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- United States v. Two Hundred Fifty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars & Ninety-Seven CentsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- Com. v. Como, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.