Legal Opinion
United States v. Khanani
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 2, 2007No. 05-11689, 05-15014PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
M. Saleem Khanani and David Portlock appeal their convictions both arguing that the district court erred in refusing to give their “mere employment” theory of defense jury instruction and that the warrant searches conducted at Portlock’s accounting business and storage facility and other locations violated the Fourth Amendment. Khanani also separately contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to grant a mistrial because of an alleged extrinsic influence on the jury, and by admitting into evidence Portlock’s statement that he “would not be…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ramon A. Mercado v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Willie McNair v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Ward v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Edgar Jamal GamoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.