Commonwealth v. Velasquez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Bobeets,
Appellant Antonio Velasquez was tried by jury in Philadelphia in 1970 and found guilty of second degree murder. Post-trial motions were denied and a sentence of not less than ten nor more than twenty years imposed. Appellant in this direct appeal argues that the Commonwealth introduced notes of testimony of a witness from an earlier proceeding1 in contravention of the Act of May 23, 1887, P. L. 158, §3, 19 P.S. §582.2 We affirm.
The Act of 1887 permits the admission of notes of testimony of a prior proceeding of a witness now deceased if the defendant was present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McGroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McGroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. RyhalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. VelasquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. KeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. StaskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.