Legal Opinion
United States v. Unexcelled Chemical Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 22, 1951No. Civ. A. 87-50PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This is an action to recover liquidated statutory damages allegedly due the United States under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U.S.C.A. § 35 et seq. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that the action is barred by the two-year period of limitation prescribed by the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 255.
The pleadings disclose as undisputed facts that on April 17, 1947 the Secretary of Labor commenced an administrative proceeding charging defendant with knowingly employing minors in violation of the Walsh-Healey Act. After hearing, the trial examiner on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMahon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Hudgins-Dize Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
- United States v. Craddock-Terry Shoe Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1949
- United States v. Sweet Briar, Inc.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950
- United States v. Craddock-Terry Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Tobin v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951
- United States v. Unexcelled Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- United States v. W. H. Kistler Stationery Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1952