Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1905No. 259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims rejecting the claim of the appellant. 39 C. Cl. 338. The claimant while a disbursing clerk of the Treasury Department received a letter from the Secretary of the Treasury, as follows: “George A. Bartlett, disbursing clerk, Treasury Department, Washington, D. C. Sir: You are hereby appointed disbursing agent for such, funds as may be advanced to you from time to time on account of the appropriation for post-office, Washington, D. C. You will be entitled to such compensation for the services named as is provided by law, and the same rate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API