Legal Opinion

STEVENS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 17, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00221Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRYAN S., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 2:22-cv-00221-NT ) KILO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION On Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, Defendant, the Social Security Administration Commissioner, found that Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he has a severe impairment and, therefore, determined Plaintiff was not disabled. The Appeals Council subsequently denied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Victoria MANSO-PIZARRO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API