Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Thompson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 3, 1984No. 84C0381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Christopher Hayward and his parents (collectively “Haywards”) have filed a two-count Complaint against a group of state and local officials, charging violations of statutory duties created by Christopher’s condition as a handicapped child. As attorney for the state defendants, the Attorney General has moved for partial dismissal of the Complaint in four respects. Each legal position asserted by the Attorney General is sound, and the motion is granted in its entirety.

First, there is no basis for joining Governor Thompson as a defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. William S. v. GillDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  2. Max M. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API