Legal Opinion

Messick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1996No. WD 50960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Harrison F. Messick brought suit against his employer, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (“Santa Fe”), pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., seeking damages for personal injury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Santa Fe. Mes-siek appeals, claiming that the trial court committed plain error by: (1) failing to allow him to testify that a Santa Fe train crew member informed his conductor by radio that a switch was faulty because such testimony was admissible as an admission of a party opponent; and (2) refusing to allow a diary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schauer v. Memorial Care Systems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  2. Moore v. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Hawthorne v. HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Virginia Dept. of Transportation v. Margaret Z. NewtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Calarosa v. StowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Gilleylen v. Surety Foods, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Osborne v. OsborneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. 39 Bell, LLC v. K&K, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API