Legal Opinion

White v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1933No. 11179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

This is a suit in the usual form of actions in trespass to try title to lands and for damages, and to establish the disputed line dividing lots Nos. 4, 5, and 6 in block 12 of the Houston & Texas Central Railroad addition to the city of Dallas, and fronting to the North on Paris street, owned by appellee, W. M. Haynes, and a parcel of land owned by appellant Mrs. Edna E. White, outside of said addition, and fronting to the South on Gibson street; also a disputed line dividing said lot No. 6 and lot No. 7 of the said railroad addition.

Appellee, as plaintiff, filed the suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Harmon v. KetchumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. City of Waco v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Scales v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HamorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Davis v. DowlenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Wofford v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. San Augustine Independent School Dist. v. FreeloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Cook v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API