Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. H. S. Anderson Trucking Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 1963No. 6613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action for damages arising out of a collision between an automobile and a truck. The plaintiffs are Mike Hernandez, the driver of the automobile, and Romulo Diaz, husband of Irene Diaz, a passenger in the automobile. Judgment was for defendant, based upon the answers of the jury to the special issues.

The collision occurred near the top of the Orange-Port Arthur bridge over the Neches River. Both vehicles were traveling in a westerly direction, when the automobile overtook and collided with the rear of the truck. The time of the collision was between 5:30 and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. S. & D. Wolf Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Mars v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Louis v. ParchmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Whitehead v. SalyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Willis Sears Trucking Company v. PateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Ewing v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API