Legal Opinion

Amco Insurance Company v. Chesley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1972No. 11058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This action for declaratory relief was commenced by the respondent, Amco Insurance Company, which sought a judgment declaring that it was not obligated to defend a civil action pending against the appellant, Paul Chesley, or to pay any resulting judgment. After both parties had moved for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The appellant appeals from this judgment and requests that it be reversed, and that judgment be entered in his favor or that the case be remanded for a trial. The other defendants in this action are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Lewellyn v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lewellyn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Emp. Ins. Co. v. YeomansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Dawn Schall Jenkins v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Flynt v. McGillenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Amco Insurance Company v. ChesleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API