Legal Opinion

Barrett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1976No. 51805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of burglarizing a warehouse. Held:

1. The trial court did not charge the jury on the right of the defendant not to testify. Code Ann. § 38-415 provides in part: "... The failure of a defendant to testify shall create no presumption against him, and no comment shall be made because of such failure:. ..” The charge as urged by the defendant would have violated the statute and would have interjected error. Linder v. State, 132 Ga. App. 624, 625 (208 SE2d 630). There was no error in failing to so charge.

2. Defendant’s enumeration that the court erred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Richey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Barrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API