Richey v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
Defendant, convicted and sentenced for burglary, appeals from the overruling of his motion for new trial. The only ground of the motion argued before this court relates to alleged newly discovered evidence. This newly discovered evidence consists of the purported post-trial declaration of a material witness for the state who gave testimony at the trial strongly tending to show the defendant’s guilt. A post-trial declaration by a state’s witness that his former testimony was false is not a cause for a new trial. Felton v. State, 56 Ga. 84; Fowler v. State, 187 Ga. 406 (1 SE2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Felton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Kidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Karvonen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.