Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. McCauley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 28, 1958No. 10,099Published

1DissentLatimeR, Judge

I dissent.

I do not dispute the fact that irregularities occurred in this trial, but they must be measured in the scales applicable to trials before special courts-martial — particularly giving consideration to the unique position occupied by the president. He is required to instruct the court on the law, and I assume from his assignment that he is entitled to read the law and incorporate in his instructions the theories we advocate in our decisions. If I am correct in that assumption, then the senior member of the court participating in the deliberations had the information properly, and I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. HirrlingerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API