Ross v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SEAN H. LANE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is a motion (ECF No. 11) (the “Motion”) by the Debtors (the “Debtors” or “American”), seeking to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint (the “Complaint”) filed in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the “Adversary Proceeding”). Debtors allege that Plaintiffs’ claims are precluded under the doctrine of res judicata because of a prior settlement and court order resolving such claims and releasing American from any liability for them. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
In 1981, Defendant American…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davidson v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Kurimsky v. Resi Whole Loan IV, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2021