Legal Opinion

Foote v. Foote

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 17, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On motion to forfeit the penalty expressed in a ne exeat bond.

The petitioner has secured a final decree for alimony under the twenty-sixth section of the Divorce act, and, at the time of initiating this motion, was entitled to arrearages of costs and counsel fee aggregating $200.16. This sum is made up of taxed costs amounting, the petitioner says, to "the sum of $100.16 total taxed costs of the entire suit," and $100 counsel fee allowed in the final decree. In the "$100.16 total taxed costs" there is included an item of $23.12, which is costs allowed on a preliminary motion. She has caused a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. SchreiberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  2. Gasteiger v. GasteigerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Penny v. PennyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Schreiber v. SchreiberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  5. Ksiazek v. KsiazekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaplan v. HeilesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API