Schreiber v. Schreiber
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Yice-Chancellor Stevenson and reported in 85 N. J. Eq. SOS. Appeal of William M. Schultz.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the court of chancery forfeiting a ne exeat bond, -and directing the surety thereon to pay to the clerk of that court the penal sum mentioned therein.
The first ground qf appeal is that the chancellor was without jurisdiction to make the order because the bond does not comply with rule 192 of the court of chancery (which regulates the procedure on writs of me exeat), in; that it was not taken by the sheriff at the time of the arrest of the defendant; and, further, because the condition of the bond varies from that required by the rule. In' disposing of this…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Harrington Co. v. HorsterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Gault v. GaultNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Connolly v. ConnollyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Beekwilder v. BeekwilderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Coursen v. CoursenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.