Legal Opinion

State v. Combs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1991No. 90-1868PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We have reviewed Combs’ fifteen propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentences, balanced the aggravating circumstance in each count against the mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and two death sentences.

I

Pretrial Statement about Lawyer

In his first proposition of law, Combs argues that the admission of his statement to Ventre, “talk to * * * [my] lawyer,” was constitutional error. When that statement was admitted, the trial court instructed the jury that the defendant…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API