Legal Opinion

Parks v. Crippin-Norris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was brought by the administrator of the estate of Thomas Crippin, deceased, to recover the value of certain personal property, which it is claimed the defendant,, the widow of the deceased, reduced to her possession and converted to her own use. Mr. Crippin died August 6, 1886, and the plaintiff was appointed administrator August 1, 1892. The suit was commenced by summons issued September 19, 1892.

*72It appears that Mr. Crippin and his wife, prior to Crippin's death, lived upon, and owned as tenants by the entirety, a farm of about 130 acres in Van Buren county. Upon the farm, at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cullen v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Hollowell v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. CoronasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916
  2. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In Re Dempster's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Windoes v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re Graham EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API