Johnsen v. Hamilton Electric

In this worker’s compensation case, claimant petitions for review of our decision dismissing his petition on the ground that Argonaut had not been served with a copy of the petition for review. 89 Or App 85, 746 P2d 1169 (1988). We treat the petition for review as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We conclude that service of the petition on Argonaut’s attorney was sufficient under ORS 656.298(3). We withdraw our former opinion and address the merits of the case.

Claimant seeks a determination that he suffers from a compensable asbestos-related lung condition and that annual…