Reiley v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Republic District Court. Replevin by Martha J. Haynes against Reiley and another.. Trial at the June Term, 1886, aud judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants bring the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
The plaintiffs in error commenced an action of replevin against James H. Haynes and George Schaaf, for the recovery of the possession of certain specific personal property, alleging that they were entitled to the possession of said property by virtue of default in the terms and conditions of certain chattel mortgages, executed by Haynes and Schaaf to them on said property. While this action was pending and undetermined, Martha J. Haynes, the wife of *260James H. Haynes, who claims to be the absolute owner of the property, commenced her action in replevin, to recover the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stone v. BirdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Gross v. BogardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- Welter v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Cunningham v. StonerIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Hubbard v. CheneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Butts v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Mann v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.