Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1986No. C9-85-856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

The City of Springfield seeks review of a Minnesota Tax Court decision holding that a medical clinic owned and operated by the city and used by physicians to provide medical services to the public on a fee-for-service basis was not exempt from real property taxes. We affirm.

In 1981, the board of the Springfield Community Hospital established a planning committee to explore methods of recruiting *803general practitioners to the city of Springfield, a rural community located in southern Minnesota. During 1981, three physicians were practicing in the city, each in his own clinic. One…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camping and Education Foundation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. State v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Community Hospital Linen Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. County of Anoka v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Ass'n of Cereal Chemists v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Chateau Community Housing Ass'n v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Chisago Health Services v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Van Buren County Hospital & Clinics v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API