Legal Opinion
County of Anoka v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1935No. Nos. 30,198, 30,211PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
This is a proceeding to enforce payment of delinquent taxes for the year 1926. The city of St.-Paul, Minnesota (hereinafter called the city), is located entirely in Ramsey county. Many years prior to 1926 the city purchased some 1,525.61 acres of land situated in Anoka county, Minnesota. On this land the city built and constructed a municipal waterworks for -the purpose of supplying water to its inhabitants and for building and maintaining sewers, extinguishing fires, cleaning and sprinkling streets, etc. The city also supplied water from this municipal waterAvorks to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Town of West Hartford v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- People Ex Rel. Mayor of New York v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- City of Rochester v. . Town of RushNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- State v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- City of Traverse City v. Township of BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christian Business Men's Committee of Minneapolis, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Yoes v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Lee v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.