Legal Opinion

Shields v. Shields

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1943No. 8379PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole ground of defendant's motion of change of place of trial was predicated upon the hypothesis that she is a resident of Madison county, Montana, and by that fact alone is entitled to have the action tried in the county in which she resides. The position of the plaintiff is, that defendant is not entitled to a change of place of trial for the reason that the action has been commenced in Silver Bow county, that is the county in which plaintiff resides, and is the county in which the defendant was found and served with summons. We assert that section 9096, Revised Codes, is controlling.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Mackey v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bergin v. TempleMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Nielsen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Willard v. ZehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Voss v. RalstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Griess v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal InvestigationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wisner v. Vandelay InvestmentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API