Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Walton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1993No. 9213SC28PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Plaintiffs do not dispute that the action abated pursuant to Rule 3 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure; instead, they argue that the trial court had the discretionary power to extend the time in which to file their complaint pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Based on the specific facts of this case, we disagree.

Rule 3, “Commencement of action”, of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure states:(a) A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court. The clerk shall enter the date of filing on the original complaint,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Congleton v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Roshelli v. SperryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Mathis v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicora Country Club, Inc. v. Town of ErwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Telesca v. SAS INSTITUTE INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Thigpen v. NgoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Riverview Mobile Home Park v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Ludemann v. BRADFORD CLINIC, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API