Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Bauer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1954No. Civ. 15854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This ease and the related case, Tinsley v. Bauer, Civil No. 15784 [post, p. 724, 271 P.2d 116], were consolidated on appeal for argument in accordance with a stipulation of the parties. The subject matter of the two appeals is, however, so distinct that they can better be treated separately.

Mrs. Tinsley, a former bookkeeper in the employ of defendant Bauer (who does business under the firm name of Bauer Cooperage Company), instituted an action in three counts based on three separate oral agreements: the first on an agreement of June 15, 1950, to pay for her services one-half of one per cent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Commonwealth v. MulreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of Fulmer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Robertson v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. First National Bank of Omaha v. First Cadco Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tinsley v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Vaughn v. CoccimiglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API