Legal Opinion

Tanis v. Eding

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 37,357PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is review of judgment dismissing a declaration for failure to state a cause of action against defendant Eding.

The declaration alleges in substance that Eding operates an automobile sales and service garage, in which Harvey Zeerip was manager and Harry Brower was an employee; that defendant Yredeveld delivered a car at the garage in exchange for a new one; that the exchange was completed except that Yredeveld did not deliver a certificate of title; that Zeerip and Brower took the car from the garage with Eding’s consent, and, while Brower was driving it negligently, it struck and injured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Loehr v. AbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Johnston v. CorneliusMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. SunstrumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. White v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bensman v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API