Legal Opinion

Elson v. Jones

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

On December 28, 1918, Edward Beynolds and wife contracted to sell certain real property to William Earl Elson and wife, appellants, on an instalment contract, the payment involved in this action being $3,000 due on or before December 28, 1920. On October 25, 1920, appellants contracted to sell the same premises to William Jones, respondent, on a similar contract, respondent to assume the payments under the Beynolds-Elson contract in so far as it concerned payments due after January 1, 1921. Appellants were obligated, but failed to make the payment of $3,000 due Beynolds December 28, 1920, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Marshall v. GilsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Sunshine Cloak & Suit Co. v. Roquette Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Spaulding v. Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boomer v. IsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hurt v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Robins v. ClingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sorensen v. LarueIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API