Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whitehead v. Whitehead

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1972No. 4996Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

LEVINSON, J.

I dissent.

I believe that HRS § 580-1,1 which establishes a one-year residence requirement as a jurisdictional prerequisite to the granting of an absolute divorce, is unconstitutional under both the Federal and State Constitutions for the following two reasons: (1) The statute deprives persons, residents in Hawaii for less than one year, of due process of law by denying them access to the only forum capable of granting them a hearing and relief on their claimed right to a dissolution of their marriages. (2) The one-year residence requirement bears no reasonable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API