Whitehead v. Whitehead
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
LEVINSON, J.
I dissent.
I believe that HRS § 580-1,1 which establishes a one-year residence requirement as a jurisdictional prerequisite to the granting of an absolute divorce, is unconstitutional under both the Federal and State Constitutions for the following two reasons: (1) The statute deprives persons, residents in Hawaii for less than one year, of due process of law by denying them access to the only forum capable of granting them a hearing and relief on their claimed right to a dissolution of their marriages. (2) The one-year residence requirement bears no reasonable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.