Legal Opinion

Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Jewell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2016No. 13-36078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Renewable energy projects, although critical to the effort to combat climate change, can have significant adverse environmental impacts, just as other large-scale developments do. Here, the Oregon Natural Desert Association and the Audubon Society of Portland (collectively, “ONDA”) challenge a wind-energy development on the ground that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”) environmental review of the project did not adequately address impacts to the greater sage grouse, a relatively large ground-dwelling bird once abundant in the western United States.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Great Basin Mine Watch v. HankinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Raymond Nichols v. Daniel MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Onda v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API