Legal Opinion

Mejea v. Whitehouse

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J. ,

Defendant ivas a contractor engaged in building the Nuuanu dam under contract- with the Territory. Plaintiff was a laborer engaged in pick and shovel work and at the time of the injury *160which gave rise to this action was working in a gang under James Howatt, who was assistant government engineer representing the Territory in the inspection of the work. It is not clear from the evidence how Howatt came to be temporarily in charge of the gang of workmen. In excavating a perpendicular bank of earth plaintiff was directed by the foreman to take the earth from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Campbell v. H. Hackfeld & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Silva v. Ewa Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kaulana v. Oahu Railway & Land Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API