Legal Opinion · Dissent

Munger v. Boardman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1939No. Civil No. 4041Published

1DissentLockwood, J.

Plaintiff filed this action against the defendants, Edna A. Munger and Charles P. Munger, her husband, to foreclose a realty mortgage. In her amended complaint, on which the case was tried, she alleged that the mortgage had been placed on the property by other parties who later conveyed it to Edna A. Munger and that the latter had thereafter dealt with it as her separate property, and in so doing, in the year 1935, at her request a written extension of the mortgage to January 28, 1937, had been executed between the plaintiff and herself. There were further allegations as to various payments…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Peterson v. Hudson InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API