Bruckman v. Kirkup
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
In this URESA action, Clarine Bruckman appeals from the trial court’s order setting child support according to the statutory guidelines but granting a temporary reduction below the guidelines amount for the first ten months of the ongoing support order. Appellant, who receives public assistance, claims the deviation was based on improper considerations and that the court disregarded the statutory demand for consideration of relevant factors and findings on the financial resources and needs of the child. We affirm the ongoing support order but modify the temporary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Marriage of Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Pitkin v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.