Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Matlock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1929No. 18890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEACH, C.

This action was commenced in the county court of Rogers county by K. M. Matlock, the defendant in error, who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff, against George Dawson, to recover a commission for services rendered as a real estate . broker, it being alleged by plaintiff in his petition that he was engaged in the business of a real estate broker and agent; that the defendant, Dawson, employed him to find a purchaser for land owned by defendant; that he did find a purchaser therefor in the person of B. F. Glover, whereby defendant was able to sell the land to such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Segnitz v. A. Grossenbach Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Harris v. OwenbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Ludeman v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kilpatrick v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API