Legal Opinion

Barker v. Waltz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1952No. 31788PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The case, tried to a jury, resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff Barker against defendants R. A. Richardson and Mrs. Richardson. The court granted a motion of the defendants for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff has appealed.

The defendants failed to move for a directed verdict or for dismissal of the action at the close of plaintiff’s case. Appellant Barker claims that defendants thereby waived any right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; that they had joined with Barker in submitting the case to the jury, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tonkovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kieburtz v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Saunders v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Turngren v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Pace v. Brodie-National, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Turngren v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API