Barker v. Waltz
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. The case, tried to a jury, resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff Barker against defendants R. A. Richardson and Mrs. Richardson. The court granted a motion of the defendants for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff has appealed.
The defendants failed to move for a directed verdict or for dismissal of the action at the close of plaintiff’s case. Appellant Barker claims that defendants thereby waived any right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; that they had joined with Barker in submitting the case to the jury, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Tonkovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Kieburtz v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Saunders v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Turngren v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Pace v. Brodie-National, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Turngren v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982