Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Pitman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

Plaintiff seeks to revoke defendant’s real estate salesman license on the ground that he accepted a commission from someone other than his employing broker. OES 696.290 and OES 696.300(1) (f). Initial administrative proceedings conducted by the real estate commissioner resulted in revocation of defendant’s license. The Marion County Circuit Court, in a trial de novo without a jury, reversed. Plaintiff now appeals.

The narrow question presented is whether defendant accepted compensation from a person other than his broker in contravention of OES 696.290 as a result of the commission arrangement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. DuBois v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Schnier v. PercivalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API