Legal Opinion

Lannom Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 27, 1986No. Appeal 85-2558PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Lannom Manufacturing Company, Inc. appeals the final decision of the United States International Trade Commission, which held that there was no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, in that Lan-nom’s U.S. Patent No. 3,976,295 (“the ‘295 patent”) was invalid and that the importation and sale of certain articles did not tend to injure the domestic industry. The Commission declined to determine infringement. In re Certain Softballs and Polyurethane Cores Therefor, Inv. No. 337-TA-190, USITC Pub. No. 1751 (September 1985).

We…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
Kinik Company v. International Trade Commission, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Ultimate Abrasive Systems, L.L.C., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
Beneficial Corporation and Subsidiaries v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.